Legal terminology translation becomes fundamental for legitimate grounds, evidentiary papers and many approved documentations. Certain people require translation in official language(s) according to special jurisdictions.
There are some countries, where its an obligation for legal translators to swear to god (or any similar oath) for attesting the legal equivalence of the target text with the original or source text.
At times, only translators with special skill-set get authorisation for swearing such oaths. And there are some cases when the translation is accepted as legally equivalent only when its coupled with the original one or a clearly sworn/certified copy.
Even when a translator is focused on legal terminology translation, or is practicing law in his/her own country, this won’t do for his/her identity to be a definitely sworn translator. Nonetheless, procedure or regulations of legal similarity can differentiate from country to country.
In the case of South Africa, a legal translator requires authorisation from the High Court. In addition, he or she essentially has to use the original (or else the original’s sworn copy) in his or her physical presence. This translator, however, might only swear on his or her own translation. There are no requirements for any additional witness (like a notary) to resolutely attest to the translations authenticity.
If you turn to Mexico, in local cases, legal authorities such as the Superior Court of Justice, can establish the authorisation of any written or oral test for giving to any translator who is recognised as ‘expert’ (a “sworn” translator would also suffice your requirements). Such translators do not swear without procuring previous permission from the court(s).
Let’s turn to the US now. These issues are supervised by legislative bodies related to The U.S. Department of Labour. It has of late affirmed that there is presently no globally uniform certification obliged for interpreters or translators working in the US. Needless to say, there is actually a range of assessments undertaken by legal translation professionals for displaying their proficiency.
The Polish practice on these issues can be regarded as unique though. However, concerned government departments govern standards for legal terminology translation. In order to work as a legal translation professional in Poland, one has to pass an official exam. Following such skill tests, the qualifying professionals come to be legally recognised as one of Poland’s ’sworn’ translators.
This is very similar to the practice in Mexico. Nevertheless, for casual translation jobs (that deal in business communications, regular administration or correspondence) its usually sufficient to employ an expert without such legal recognition.
Get your online Legal Terminology Translation, please visit http://www.expertlanguages.com.
Leave a Comment